Visit Redruby's column >>

REDRUBY

Generic female, idealist
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 54; Links Seeded: 3131
Member Since: 1/2006Last Seen: 11/27/2009

Don't expect Obama to get tough with Israel

advertisement

The President-elect has much more important priorities than a radical change of direction on the Middle East

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.0
{"commentId":4662107,"authorDomain":"redruby"}

Excerpt:

The challenges confronting him - put simply, rescuing the US economy from a possible depression and winning wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - won't leave much time for eye-catching new initiatives on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. And that's before he has to decide how to deal with the emerging Iranian nuclear threat.

It's probably reasonable to assume that Obama Middle East policy won't be a carbon copy of President Bush's. And if anything can really be achieved by rhetoric, you can just about guarantee that the new president will achieve it.

But those who think that, at least, a return to the pre-Bush days of US policy may be at hand should remember this.

Mr Obama's administration will be staffed with many veterans of those frustrating years. The Clinton Administration tried about as hard as any government has to produce a settlement - and failed.

With an economy to rescue and American power in the world to be saved, there is unlikely to be much appetite for going down that track again.

{"commentId":4662107,"threadId":"460504","contentId":"2273677","authorDomain":"redruby"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 5:52 PM EST
{"commentId":4662906,"authorDomain":"jhynde"}

For anyone taking Gerard Baker and the London Times at face value, it is important to note that the London Times is owned by Rupert Murdoch, owner of amongst other things, the NY Post and FOX. Therefore, anything concerning Israel or even Europe, should be taken with more than just a pinch of salt. 

{"commentId":4662906,"threadId":"460504","contentId":"2273677","authorDomain":"jhynde"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 7:15 PM EST
{"commentId":4664370,"authorDomain":"buddysej"}

I don't expect PE Obama to get tough with Israel.  Now should he!  I expect him to support Israel and I expect Israel to play fair, perhaps?  But then again, all is fair in love and war. 

{"commentId":4664370,"threadId":"460504","contentId":"2273677","authorDomain":"buddysej"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 9:27 PM EST
{"commentId":4666222,"authorDomain":"icyn22ro"}

there are rules for war.....................this is not a war.  This is placing human beings in a box and taking your shots at them.

{"commentId":4666222,"threadId":"460504","contentId":"2273677","authorDomain":"icyn22ro"}
  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:57 AM EST
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"460504","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"460504","contentId":"2273677"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking